I read the other day a book about Carl Jung, where I learned
that a lot of his contributions to psychology
, found its roots in one single understanding:” there is a story in everybody
that needs to be told.”
He made a lot of progress in understanding what was not
going according to plan under the bonnet of a mentally ill person, by finding the
point where telling the story got compromised.
In listening and allowing the original story to pick up
where it left of, he reached an amazing
success rate in people functioning well after the treatment he provided. When
people pick up telling their own story, uncompromised, many mental ailments
vanish.
Jung also gained a lot of insight on the story-telling side of humans and made
those insight available to all people
interested in understanding human behaviour more.
It appealed to me so much, since I recognise it, from my
work and play.
When life goes on the blink, when the going gets tough, what
is happening is simply not within the blueprint of the original story. A small
thing can be out of tune, or a number of things don’t correspond anymore. That
causes friction within oneself. It needs attention, to go back on track with its
natural flow.
I’d say, the attention it needs is not so much from a position
as a reader. I personally don’t think that the story is already written in full
detail and all you have to do is turn the pages ( be a consumer of your life),
although listening to you own story and feeling it, does give may clues on
where is starts to derail.
I’d say, it needs the attention of a storyteller, having the
inherent understanding of what the rhythm and flow of your story is, the main
characteristics of it and a sense of beginning, fluid continuity with interest and
end.
Herman Koch, a Dutch writer, explained it saying that the
first sentence of a book is given to him (as in a thunderstruck) , and he senses its DNA, full potential and he senses
its general shape: a novel. He feels the whole book, although it still
has to be written. Every day, he simply picks up where he left of and writes
more of it. The novel seems to be writing itself, although he has choices on
various details. All is well, he indicates, when he regularly checks if he is
still in touch that sense of its DNA blueprint.
I suspect that he, if and when he gets stuck with it, he
goes back to the last point where he felt it was fully in line with that DNA of
the novel and continues from there.
The DNA blueprint of a story, the DNA blueprint of a person’s
story is known.
If you lose sight of it, there are still ways to get connect with it, look into
it, to get back on track.
I often say, there are two copies in this Universe of the original
blueprint for your life.
One is within yourself, the other is in the Knowing.
No comments:
Post a Comment